The stuff Hacker News actually recommends.

GPUs and CPUs

NVIDIA GTX

17owners with an opinion
85%of verdicts positive
0/0positive/negative since 2024
0happy after 3+ years

Praised for performance and reliability; criticized for ease of use.

What people wrote

NeutralOwned 6 years
tl;dr: You can improve performance by clearing up some space from a full storage device. Also, video game streaming exists and can be a more affordable alternative to buying a boutique PC from Alienware. Counter point: it's okay to turn down the specs on your games. Modern "AAA" PC games are usually pretty good about helping you tune your settings to find a good balance between performance and visual fidelity. It looks like this author has a Corsair One, which I suspect has an RTX 2080 graphics card. He considers that "questionable for a number of new games [he] wanted to play". As someone who has been using a GTX 980 Ti for over six years, I find that very hard to believe. Maybe he's a very competitive gamer who needs high frame rates but doesn't want to completely sacrifice visual fidelity. But then how is the inherent latency and artifact from streaming an acceptable compromise?
Likes it
Hashcat is unbelievable! On a lark, I tried to crack my own WPA key for my local network. Captured the handshake, downloaded some wordlists, started it. I have an older CPU and graphics card, i7 4930k + GTX 1060. Some regular CPU based method, I ran the numbers and figured it would take a bit over a week. Ran it for a day, and then decided to see if something better was available. Read about Hashcat, gave it a go, and it finished in 90 minutes. At first, I thought I made a mistake and it crapped out, but nope! It cracked it. It was done. 90 minutes on modest hardware. Imagine if you invested some real money in it with a modern system!
Likes it
Is there a reason you can't use Colab? That would be the first suggestion. A pro license costs about 600 a year. Next question is what are you training? The latest cards are almost certainly faster, but you're normally concerned by VRAM than absolute speed. The 3090 (or the older Titan series) is unique in consumer cards in that you get almost double the RAM of the next cards down. I've had no problem training models on an 1080ti 8GB card but I wouldn't want to go smaller than that. System RAM is cheap in comparison, you can easily spec a 128GB machine, M.2 SSDs are a must for fast data loading, etc. Most CPUs are quads now, but more cores and lots of RAM means you can run more parallel dataloaders. Otherwise there are plenty of guides that do a cost analysis of which cards to buy. If money no object then the 3090/Titan series, but maybe you don't need that much RAM. I saw a sibling comment mentions issues with heat - the stock 3090 has terrible VRAM cooling. I water cooled mine and it works well, but it's not cheap at all.
Neutral
> Ryzen 5600X Ooh, I've got one of those! I've been getting by trying to run it on my PC, which for various reasons currently has a 5800 and a GTX 1050 4GB, which can just bearly handle optimizedSD at 90s/image but runs out of memory if I try to use the popular webui repo. Swapping to the 5600X might be worth it!
Neutral
Yeah, I do the same. Although my 1070 is very long in the tooth thanks to the last couple of years of GPU madness. And now that prices have come down significantly, it's not really a good time financially for me to buy a new GPU. Murphy's law...
Doesn’t like it
There were some very powerful software upgrades you could preform on GPUs... https://verrytechnical.info/safely-unlocking-extra-shaders-i... Would AMD have been in the right to force a bios downgrade in the next driver release? Also that LTT and a related Gamers Nexus video convinced me to buy an obviously counterfeit "Nvidia GTX 970" from ebay, report the seller for the sale, I got to keep it, I got refunded, and then with the money I bought a bios writer and flashed the card back to a "Nvidia GTX 550 Ti".
Likes it
This, every single article I have read so far is missing this VERY important piece of information. I am still mining ETH and it is still profitable. I mine with 4 1080s and I do not pay for power. However, if I would have 200+ gpus I would slowly start selling before the prices tank due to the merge. Also more dedicated mining hardware is hitting the market for ETH which is far more efficient then gpu mining.
Likes it
I have lost a few save-games, so I can relate. In my case it was because I forgot about them or the fact that, I did care if they were lost (I rarely game at all). I have an "offline" Windows 7 gaming PC (only connected to a dedicated file-server, that holds the game installers, drivers, etc). I only use this PC to play Witcher 3, Fallout 3/NV, and a few others. I found this PC (i5-2500K) at the side of the curb, and invested ~$21 in 16GB of RAM, and ~$230 in a GTX 1660 Ti (6GB). It runs my games at Ultra settings in 1080p, so I am pretty happy with it. It has happened that I have lost save-games because I did a reinstall and forgot some save-games because "There is nothing important on this PC!" ...doh... I then switched to using Duplicati for backing up save games, screenshots and game configs to the dedicated file-server. I don't bother with that anymore though, because the gaming PC now runs off a FibreChannel SAN backed by ZFS Volumes. So I have snapshot, rollback and clones. Which is also quite useful for testing drivers, and rolling back to "a clean install" or "a clean install + windows updates via WSUS-offline" without waiting for the installer or updates.
Doesn’t like it
I'm actually using a Hackintosh! Mavericks is my favorite operating system, but there's no question that modern CPUs are superior to older and slower ones. OS X releases won't boot on Intel platforms newer than what existed at the time of their introduction. Someone with deep knowledge of XNU could fix this with a custom kernel and/or runtime patches, but I'm not that person. When I decided to downgrade to Mavericks, my initial plan was to use a type 1 hypervisor with GPU passthrough for close-to-bare-metal performance on modern Intel platforms. Unfortunately, I have never been able make GPU passthrough work under Mavericks. I tried two different Mavericks-compatible graphics cards, a GTX 780 6GB and a GTX 780 Ti. In both cases, passthrough works fine in High Sierra, but not in the older releases I wanted to run. Then I discovered that in 2017, a developer named Bronya had released a custom Mavericks kernel with Ryzen compatibility, to little fanfare. I ran down to microcenter and bought the just-released 16-core Ryzen 3950x, and went about building what would probably have been the most powerful Mavericks machine on the planet. It worked , but only when graphics acceleration was disabled. My GTX 780 Ti froze after logging in. My GTX 780 displayed a beautiful desktop in full resolution, but the entire machine slowed to a crawl when it was in use. Opening new Finder windows took upwards of 60 seconds, perhaps related to a cryptic message that kept appearing in the console: "k…
Neutral
Hey you again. c: >I have an Nvidia 1080ti Fwiw, I used Linux with an 1080 Ti for years; it was the first card I tried Linux on. The only hitch is having to install Nvidia's proprietary drivers. Distros with GUI tools for drivers (e.g., Manjaro) make this easy. The only problem was actually my G-SYNC monitor. It was one of those super expensive ones with G-SYNC hardware in it. It turns out those just go black if you're not using an Nvidia card && aren't running proprietary drivers. At some point, I gave it and my 1080 Ti away and got an AMD card with FreeSync monitors. Funnily, the FreeSync doesn't actually work. (Luckily, I don't care that much about tearing, and it's less noticeable at >=144 Hz.) AND, with AMD, you don't have a nice GPU settings panel like Nvidia provides (as basic as it is compared to its Windows equivalent). I've noticed no other differences. Nevertheless, having the open source driver in-kernel and not worrying about installing it out of band is nice. >no VR solution really works that well on Linux, even Valve's. Yep, probably; tech is too new. I don't even try stuff like that until it's 30 years old and mainlined. ;D >GNOME Yeah, I don't know how anyone sane likes GNOME, and it's insane to me that KDE isn't the default DE instead. I reckon it's a combo of inertia, the fact that the GNOME faction were the GPL purists compared to TrollTech back in the day, and (enduring?) convergence/low-tech user adoption hopes.
Likes it
There is still a lot of fun to be had! Driver support for packet injection in Kali Linux is fantastic now, making it easy to spray de-auth packets with most hardware and capture your auth packets without having to wait. I tested out Hashcat recently with my GTX 1060 (a modest card), and could burn through 170k WPA2 hashes a second. That's a long way from brute force, but doable for most wordlist attacks.
Likes it
Plus you can play on Steam on GNU/Linux so you're not restricted to Windows. It's pretty much the same runtime that's gonna land on the Steam Deck. I play some pretty demanding games and it runs flawless. While technically it does not require discrete graphics hardware, in practice it does, but its been smooth sailing with my somewhat old NVIDIA GTX1060 GPU.