The stuff Hacker News actually recommends.

Headphones · Bose QuietComfort

Bose QuietComfort QC35 II

11owners with an opinion
89%of verdicts positive
2/0positive/negative since 2024
1 yrslongest happy owner
0happy after 3+ years

Praised for reliability and battery.

What owners wrote

Likes itOwned 1 year
I have a pair of QC35's (v2, I think). They're OK. I'm in the Apple ecosystem and decided to try them with the idea of returning them if I didn't like them. The NC isn't hugely better, but the transparent mode is kickass. I use it all the time. I think they are overpriced, but after more than a year with them I'm happy I have them. Note that they were really tight when I got them and I saw a post on reddit about bending the top bar to make them looser. Before doing it I couldn't wear them more than an hour at a time. Now I can wear them all day. I have a bias against Sony, for many reasons (over the years), though I have no doubt their headphones are really good, too.
Likes it
Everyone gets to feel their own feelings, but there's just so much that doesn't resonate with me here... > I can’t use my Bluetooth earbuds while they’re charging. Many bluetooth headphones have battery life measuring in tens of hours. And every set I've used, long life or otherwise, recharge to 80% in a handful of minutes. I agree that an airpod's miniscule battery life is appalling, but you can stand to pull them out of your ears for five minutes every four hours, and you can charge them one at a time so you never need to stop listening, and my Bose QC35IIs still get more than an entire day of playtime after multiple years of recharge cycles. > In a critical-care facility, it’s hard enough to find one free mains socket to connect a charger to, let alone two. I haven't used a single-port USB charger in a decade. All of my chargers have multiple ports on them. GaN tech makes them very compact even at high power output. > Sound quality is better. Maybe in the abstract, but for most people this isn't meaningfully true in any way that actually matters to them. And if you're listening to "comedy shows and audiobooks" it definitely doesn't matter. Speech has an extremely limited useful frequency range, and those tracks are typically extremely compressed without any ill effect. > The headphone jack is a “just works” kind of technology... Nothing is ever fully a "just works" kind of technology. Things only just work until they stop working. The 3.5mm jack wore out after a ye…
Likes it
I used to have these complaints but the past 4-5 years have been smooth sailing for me. Perhaps I'm lucky. I use BT devices all day long (Bose QC35 II with Macbook, Pixel Buds Pro with Google Pixel 4 and more recently 7 Pro). Have to confess I rarely use BT in combination with Microsoft Windows though.
Likes it
I have both the Bose QC-35 ii and the Airpod pros. The Bose have better noise reduction. Plus, if you really want total quiet, you can wear earplugs underneath the Bose. The Airpod Pros are good but the physical noise isolation isn't that great. The rubber tips in Etymotics are far superior. Even my Jabras had better physical noise isolation than the Airpod Pros. My friend has the Sony WH1000XM3, so I got to play around with those. They have slightly better noise cancelation than the Bose. However, the Bose are more comfortable to me because they rest around your ear instead of on your ear like the Sony's.
Doesn’t like it
The QC-35 ii product is a regression. I use both all day. Changing pairs when the battery dies. Bluetooth range is about half as good as original QC-35. When I go in/out of range there is a ~5 second audio delay until power cycle the headphones. I have to frequently re-pair bluetooth. It tries to intelligently switch between my phone and laptop but this doesn’t work at all. I hope the next gen is better.
Recommends it
The noise cancelling is very good, but not better according to rtings.com [1]. I think that the comfort while sleeping/resting is a valid concern. I really like how comfortable the QC-35 II are, but you can’t rest your head against them. The Bose 700 headphones appear to have better mics as the main advantage over the QC-35 II. Personally I like the sound of the Bose headphones better than Sony’s, but judging from online comments I think that most people prefer the more bass heavy Sony sound. My advice to OP for over ear headphones would be the QC-35 II. Physical buttons, decent sound quality (although you can get better sound quality if you don’t need noise cancelling) and very comfortable. I can’t speak for the Apple AirPod Pros, as I’ve never used them. [1] https://www.rtings.com/headphones/tools/compare/bose-quietco...
Neutral
I think the new benchmark seems to be the Sony WH-1000XM3. I was lucky enough to be able to try these and the Bose QC35II and for me the Sony just edged it. They are over ear, have extraordinary battery life and are very comfortable. They can even hold their own on the London Underground which is saying something. Highly recommended!
Neutral
+1 to the Koss Porta Pros, and their cheaper sibling - the Sporta pro. They both sound fantastic, and are cheap. They do leak sound quite a bit - people standing in a bus next to you will know what you are listening to. I've also loved the Sennheiser Momentum II wireless over-the-ear head phones. They sound fantastic, but are expensive. Their noise cancellation works well enough. They look great, feel great and sound great. I am now going through a set of wireless Bose QC35 (series II). They are decent. They sound like a generic set of headphones, nothing to complain about, but not really good enough to get excited over. The active noise cancellation is buggy - severely distorts my audiobooks at times and I have to turn the noise cancellation off and on again to make it go away. I also always carry my airpods - they sound ok, but feel very liberating. I'm strongly considering upgrading to airpods v2, but I've spent a bunch on headphones already :-) Not looking to spend any more money on headphones.