The stuff Hacker News actually recommends.

Desktops and mini PCs · Apple iMac

Apple iMac 5K

19owners with an opinion
93%of verdicts positive
11/1positive/negative since 2024
9 yrslongest happy owner
3happy after 3+ years

Praised for display and performance; criticized for reliability and design.

What owners wrote

Likes itOwned 9 years
I've been looking for an upgrade from my 2015 5k iMac 27. Might finally pull the trigger on this version. What I will miss is the 27 inch 5k display. Also, my use case is exactly what this iMac is meant for - shared family computer that takes up little space in the kitchen.
Likes itOwned 8 years
> I thought that by 2024 we would have displays with 250+ dpi resolution, The "retina" iMac 27" (5K display, ~218 PPI) came out in 2014. I've been using this resolution since 2016. 32" 8K seems like the next logical step but it's disappointingly expensive/unavailable.
Likes itOwned 5 yearsStill going
I have working hardware from every decade, oldest is from 1982, but my daily driver and what I'm typing on now is a 2019 iMac 5K and Apple still doesn't have anything all-in-one to replace it. My keyboard is from 2002 (the USB version of the Kinesis I bought in ~ 1993). My oldest computer still in 24/7 use is my 2014 FreeNAS, but it's using a monitor that's so old I don't even know. Old hardware is great, but I do appreciate just how much better LCD panels have gotten over time.
Likes it
I've been using a new program called RetinaRelay[0] to use my 5k iMac as a second display for my M1 Macbook using an ethernet (or Thunderbolt for even better performance). Works brilliantly. It's definitely higher latency than a normal monitor (my ethernet connection is 45ms vs 5ms for a monitor) but it's not noticeable for coding and miles better than remote desktop or similar. [0] https://www.retinarelay.com/
Neutral
> If you don’t even see the difference between 1080p and 720p, there’s something else going on. If I open a browser window and click on a YT video suggested on the main page, it plays on small portion of the screen of my 14" MacBook: there is little practical visual difference between 720 and 1080 at that 'video box' size. If I open the same video on my 27" 5K iMac and full screen it there, then yes, there is a difference between 720 and 1080 (and 4K) there. But I find 60fps does not improve the content / experience in any situation.
Likes it
As a both old Linux and now decade user of MacOS, after I got used to no middle-click paste and no focus-follows-mouse: 1. Keyboard shortcuts are Emacs, Ctrl-A: start of line, E: end of line, K: kill selected or to end of line, Y to paste, etc. https://support.apple.com/en-au/102650#text 2. Karabiner elements (FOSS) fixes keyboard mappings outside of the Settings: https://karabiner-elements.pqrs.org/ 3. I have the dock on the left hand side, not bottom and I have a 2 monitor (iMac 5K 27"+ Dell 4K 27") setup with the iMac flat in front of me and the curve/2nd to the right. Menu bar is then close to the main windows. 4. Menu bar widgets etc are fixable with thaw https://github.com/stonerl/Thaw 5. Window management via keyboard is fixable with rectangle https://rectangleapp.com/ 6. Use Macports to add all the Linux/Unix utilities, works with MacOS properly (eg Python/Java frameworks). Ports can have variants, plus you can have multiple versions installed side-by-side with `port select`. https://www.macports.org/ Not sure about fonts, on a 5K iMac they're fine and the 4K Dell works too. You need to use a resolution that fits with Mac's ideas of resolution, so I've got the 5K and 4K both at 2560x1440, which is Mac's idea of 2x resolution.
Likes it
I went from a 27" 4k display to my 5k iMac I converted to work as an external display. You can definitely see the difference, especially with text. The 4k - although a HUGH improvement over 1080p monitors - will still have that fuzziness on fonts.
Likes it
Indeed, leaving Windows behind for the odd application is easy. With the depreciation of my late 2017 Intel iMac 5k incoming, i however wonder how to ditch macOS for Linux and keep the one odd Mac App I kinda depend on - ideas welcome! If you’re wondering, the App is MoneyMoney and keeps track of all bank accounts automatically, sorts all spendings into categories etc. There simply seems to be no equivalent, and running Mac Apps on Linux just doesn’t seem to be a thing yet (at least in a half-viable way I know of, and yes, I at least read about Darling). Again, if anyone does have a pointer (running macOS virtualized? What’s the status there?) would be much appreciated.. Edit: oh and i fully intend to keep using the iMac, its an i7 with 64GB RAM and the 5k display is still so gorgeous to look at.
Likes it
I have the last gen 27” 5k iMac with nano texture as my primary monitor these days and you can immediately tell the difference between image quality, compared to a glossy MacBook pro. Don’t get me wrong, it’s by far the best quality matte finish I’ve ever seen and I would buy it again, because it works great in a room with south-facing windows, but it definitely affects the overall image quality noticeably.
Doesn’t like it
Actually you can use them as external displays but requires some hackery. See https://ohmypizza.com/2023/04/converting-a-5k-imac-into-an-e... But yeah agree entirely there. When upgrading from my somewhat cranky old 5k iMac a while back, I decided I'd never buy another iMac. The 24" was out. So I bought a Studio Display and a mac mini. At least I can upgrade the computer separately, which has happened already (M2 mini -> M4 mini). I expect the Studio Display to last a long time as you can actually buy parts for it.
Likes it
Don’t landfill it please sell on eBay or locally. Crazy people like me that love the monitors and just surf the web will buy them. I was awestruck the other day how much I would have to spend to exceed the monitor quality on our ancient iMac. I bought a modern 4k one and it was still worse. They really put the magic in those old 5k monitors.
Likes it
Try https://dortania.github.io/OpenCore-Legacy-Patcher/ I recently used it on a 2014 5k iMac to install Sonoma (14.3) and it's been flawless in my experience - everything is buttery smooth as you'd expect. I also installed on a 2015 Macbook (12"...horrible Intel mobile processor.) It works, but the CPU is just too underpowered to do basic stuff like web browsing and messaging...if you're impatient like me anyway ;)
Likes it
I tried the 2015 model for 1 year and ended up selling it. The CPU and GPU ran too hot and the fans were audible too often. Also impossible to use on my lap. Since I don't need much mobility these days I bought an iMac 5k and it was a great decision. Best Mac I've ever owned. When I need to move I have an old 2014 13'' MBP lying around.
Neutral
The iMac isn't even that great for aesthetics, at least if you VESA mount it and have a decent amount of external gear connected. I have the VESA-mount model of the 2017 27" iMac, and I end up having a bunch of cables hanging down that I wouldn't with regular displays. Additionally, I find it difficult to rotate the display into portrait mode because of all the cables attached, so I don't bother even though I'd occasionally like to. If I had a separate monitor, I'd only have at most two or maybe even only one cable running to each display which would be easy to tuck away within the mounting arm. I'd be able to have most of my cables tucked away instead of the exposed mess of cables I have with the iMac. To make things worse, they don't offer Target Display Mode like they did for a short while, so I can't use the iMac's 5K display with any other machines (e.g. work laptop when I work from home). If I were buying today, I'd get a Mac Mini (and maybe an eGPU if I ended up unsatisfied with the built-in GPU), and just use my old 30" 2560x1600 monitor or get something like a huge 38" ultra-wide display (the 27" 5K is very nice, but HiDPI isn't a game-changer for me). In 2017, the 27" iMac appeared to be the best desktop Mac option (user-replaceable RAM up to 64GB was a huge factor), and I don't regret purchasing it, but the integrated display with no Target Display Mode is a massive disadvantage.
Likes it
I've been using Linux for 2 decades, and this year I moved to MacOS, with the newest MacBook and a 5K iMac. Everything pretty much just works, is much prettier by default than I ever got my Linux installations to be. Given my experiences, I have full trust that the MacOS engineers will do good stuff with Mojave too, at least eventually. I still like Desktop Linux, though, and sincerely wish it will be as good some day. It most definitely is not today.
Neutral
my setup: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/559047/doupe.jpg middle: 5K, iMac (mid 2015) left: 4K, 27" Dell P2715Q right: old Apple Cinema LED Display 27" mid-bottom-left: iPhone 5s, for testing mid-bottom-right: iPad Air, for testing, sometimes TweetDeck/HipChat with DuetDisplay I think 5K iMac can drive 5K, plus two external 4K displays at full speed without issues edit: also note that all the displays are 27", so they naturally fit side-by-side, that seems to be a detail, but it is quite important for seamless mouse movement (aligned virtual desktops). Even if physical pixel densities are not the same, all displays have the same virtual size: see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/559047/aligned-displays.... . And the keyboard: http://www.daskeyboard.com , also highly recommended for a developer.
Neutral
I am self-employed, and work from home 99% of the time. One of the bedrooms is my office, and is used exclusively for that purpose. +Desk: I have a desk that I bought from Green Furniture Solutions in Portland. 72"W x 36"D, that has raising and lowering controls. +Treadmill: LifeSpan Fitness TR5000-DT3 (for walking while I work) +Chair: Some non-descript (but comfy) chair from Office Depot +Monitor: 2015 Retina 5K iMac 27" 64GB of RAM, mounted on a Humanscale M8 VESA arm. I used this to switch between sitting and walking modes (see picture) +Input devices: Apple Magic Keyboard Apple Magic Trackpad 2 Apple Magic Mouse 2 Music: Back and forth between Pandora and a playlist of techno on YouTube. Hours: I try to keep something like 7a - 4p, but I'm self-employed. If often goes like this: 7a - whenever I finish the work I need to do for the day +Server room: Dell PowerEdge T430 tower. 2x quad-core Xeons, 384GB of RAM, 8TB of storage. self-built box: 8-core Atom, 64GB of RAM, 4TB storage Mac Mini 2011 model Synology 1815+: with 20TB of storage Ubiquiti Networks plumbing: 24-port EdgeSwitch, 2 Unifi routers, 1 Unifi UAC-AP-Pro 2 Internet connections. Frontier. Comcast. lvb dot io slash 1RYCQG9 for a picture of desk/treadmill/chair setup lvb dot io slash 1RYNLQ9 for a picture of the "server room"
Likes itHasn’t owned it
Ah yes for those use cases it makes perfect sense. Apple excuse for stopping the big iMacs was that when you bundle up the display with the compute it makes it hard to upgrade and the whole thing become useless. But in reality it just looks like some bad "reasoning" to force people to spend more on a less elegant solution that probably won't get upgraded that much. At least an old school 5K iMac can have some secondary use case, like you demonstrated or even just to watch movies, do some light document editing and such. And you can convert them to displays if you really want, but that should have been a built-in functionnality in the first place. I guess this is why they still commend a relatively high-price, a good large display still has many uses even if the compute is weak. The studio display is kinda useless outside of Mac use, so even though it's great quality its really not a good deal. I really hope Apple finally release another big iMac because I won't get another Mac Mini or a Mac Studio. I like macOS (less so nowadays) but the whole point of the Mac was the integrated hardware for base/mid-range power. Their small desktop boxes that cannot take any upgrades are really pointless as a desktop because you end up with cable galore and not much space saved. This is so stupidly inelegant, I can feel Jobs rolling in his grave. They added front accessible ports, so that's something I guess, but come on, they stink of greed and profit maximisation at all costs...
Doesn’t like itHasn’t owned it
Yup my dad bought an iMac back in 2014. It was that one model that didn't support targeted display mode. It broke about a month back (looks like drive failure) but had been having tons of issues before this due to newer software dropping support. He should be able to just buy a cheap mac mini second hand and plug it into that gorgious 5k imac display, but nope. Cant do that. Apple just like every other company could not give less of a crap about ewaste. There is absolutely zero reason why they couldn't relax the limits on older hardware to allow it to be repurposed. What's now going to happen in my dads case is he'll buy a cheap 4k monitor, probably a second hand mac mini and send the iMac to a charity for recycling. The whole Intel -> ARM thing though was absolutely about performance and Intel's utterly awful processors holding them back. The forced upgrades were just a bonus for Apple.
Likes itHasn’t owned it
I can't even name one other than an iMac that I would want to use. The whole reason to want to use the older 27" 5k iMac is that it's an incredible display. Better than you can buy, other than the 27" Apple Studio Display.